WELCOME TO THE ME 274 BLOG

Here you can add discussion posts as well as add comments to existing posts. Links are also provided to solution videos and other pages of the course website for your easy access.

__________________________________________

THE BLOG

TO ADD A POST, click here.

Monday, September 10, 2007

Regarding the magic of 5/138



is the IC of the circle on the right at the bottom of the inner circle or the outer circle, in what i've labeled as F or in what i've labeled as G? is that outer circle moving? thanks.

22 comments:

CMK said...

Good question (and nice artwork!).

The wheel is rolling without slipping, with point F in contact with a stationary surface. Therefore, F has zero velocity (hence, the IC for the wheel).

The wheel on the left moves as a single rigid body (a single angular velocity and a single angular acceleration for the body).

G is just "another point on the wheel".

jonbrueck said...

Is the velocity of O equal to the velocity of C?

CMK said...

It turns out that v_O is NOT equal to v_C. What you need in order to relate the motion of the two wheels is that v_B = v_A. (From this, you can see that v_O < v_C.)

Mburr said...

I know you cannot use instant centers for the radius in the acceleration equation. What do you use for r after you find omega of the first wheel?

Mburr said...

Or is acceleration of A equal to acceleration of C?

Tommy Woroszylo said...

I found omega for both of the circles, but am having trouble finding values for acceleration.
Right now I have Ac = Aic + (alpha x r) - (omega^2*r). I know r, omega, and Ac. After I substitute those in I still need to find Aic and alpha.
Any suggestions?

Scott N said...

I am having a hard time finding the angular acceleration of the small wheel. I've found the angular velocity to be 2.66. I wrote an equation for each relating A_a-->A_c, then
A_c-->A_instant center, then
A_a-->A_instant center. But when i subsitute 2 equations into the third, i get the angular acceleration to be 0. Any Help?

Mburr said...

tom what r did you use?

kgjohnso said...

Is the acceleration of the non-slipping point of wheel C equal 0?

Mburr said...

no it does not equal zero

WaltGrove said...

How do you solve the acceleration equation if the IC doesn't equal 0.

Jerad said...

scott- I believe that A_c and A_instant center are the same point, so that makes sense that the angular acceleration becomes zero. i believe that you need to relate A-a to A-b and A_b to A_d and then you should get a system of equations to solve.

L. Bashover said...

I still don't understand how to relate the acceleration of point A to that of point B. Could someone explain this?

kgjohnso said...

At the instant, isn't Aa = Ab?

Scott N said...

To find A_a, i need the angular acceleration of the wheel on the right. This i still can't get.

elaine said...

Is the acceleration of point A same as point B?

Peter Griffin said...

So would I be correct in saying that wa = wc (yes those "w"'s are omegas)

Andrew Crandall said...

The way I worked it out was the V_A = V_B and a_A i = a_B i. That is, only the i components of the accelerations of A and B are equal. The perpendicular components are different because the wheel's have different radii. I was able to get a complete expression for a_B, however I don't know any other accelerations on that left wheel....so I have too many unknowns and can't solve for alpha, and therefore the acceleration of D. My hunch is that a_O=a_C, but I'm not sure why since their velocities aren't equal. Please correct me if anything I said was incorrect because I've kind of hit a wall.

W_Groff said...

I was assuming that a_A = a_O because both are only moving in the +i direction. Can anyone validate that the distance x between pt. A and pt. O is not changing. This would at least narrow down possibilities for solving the problem.

CMK said...

We have had quite a few comments posted on this since I last checked. I will respond to all of the new comments here:

--to mburr--
As stated above, the IC for the wheel on the left is at point F; thus, the r that you use for omega for this wheel is 0.3 meters (distance from F to B). The IC for the wheel on the right is at its contact with ground. For this wheel the r value to use to find omega is 0.15 meters (distance from IC to C). To find the speed of A, you use 0.3 meters (distance from IC to A).

However, I am not sure that I am answering the question that you are wanting to ask since you began asking about acceleration. If I am not answering your question, let me know.


--to mburr--
The acceleration of A is NOT the same as the acceleration of C. Use the acceleration equation between the IC of this wheel to C to find alpha (note that the acceleration of the IC for this wheel points in the y-direction). Then use an acceleration equation between C and A to find a_A.

--to tommy woroszylo--
You are almost there. With the acceleration equation that you give, you can solve for the two unknowns of a_IC and alpha (note that a_IC has only a y-component).

--to scott n--
See my comment above to tommy woroszylo. That should lead you to the answer. If not, let us know.

--to mburr--
You need to use the vector from the IC to A: this will be 0.3*j.

--to kgjohnso--
All that you know about the acceleration of the no-slip contact point here is that its horizontal component is zero. There will be a non-zero vertical component as we talked about in class.

--to mburr--
Yes!

--to waltgrove--
See tommy woroszylo's comment and my response above.

--to boilerup--
a_C and a_IC are not equal. a_C is to the right (+x-direction). a_IC is vertical (+j-direction).

--to l. bashover--
The horizontal components of a_A and a_B are the same (since the cable does not stretch). The vertical components might not be the same.

--to kglohnso--
See comment above to l. bashover.

--to scott n--
First relate the accelerations of the IC and point C. See comment to tommy woroszylo above.

--to elaine--
See comment to l. bashover above.

--to peter griffen--
The fundamental point is that v_A = v_B. Use this to relate the omegas for the two wheels. (It turns out that the omegas are also equal; however, this is true for the one example and not true in general.)

--to andrew crandall--
You need to relate a_B to a_F using the x-component of the acceleration equation. This will give you alpha for the wheel on the left.

You are correct in doubting the validity of saying that a_C equals a_O -- they are not the same.

--to w_groff--
From the acceleration equation, you know:
a_A = a_C + alpha_AC x r_A/C -omega_AC^2*r_A/C
From this you can see that a_A cannot equal a_C.
Although the distance between these two points is constant, there accelerations are NOT the same.


To all: Let me know if I missed your questions with my answers.

Scott said...

I have found alpha for the body on the left but now don't know how to relate a_B to a_D. I have too many unknowns (ie. a_F & a_B). Does anyone have any suggestions?

CMK said...

--to scott--
Sorry for the delay in responding to you comment. I did not have time to check the blog before class today.

Knowing alpha for the left wheel and the x-component of a_B, you can write an acceleration equation between O and B in order to find the y-component of a_B. Then you would be in a position to write an acceleration equation between B and D to get a_D.